Myth Blaster: Copenhagen Treaty and New World Order

Joan Bartelson [Friend of LPJ] sent me a link to a YouTube video that is a Myth Blaster job because, she stated:

Don’t know if there is any truth behind this. …  If this is true we are in for a rude awakening.

The video is a speech warning Americans that the upcoming treaty to be signed by nations, including America, will initiate the New World Order planned by United Nations members using the global warming/climate change hoax as a means to catapult their agenda into reality. Citizen journalists and bloggers have been spreading the word – President Obama is going to sign away the sovereignty of the United States in Copenhagen with the Climate Change (formerly Global Warming) treaty that will set the gears in motion for a New World Order as first mentioned when George H. Bush was president.

Myth Blaster Verdict:

TRUE. The treaty is referred to as the Copenhagen Treaty. Some advise not to panic. But the underlying truth is being revealed.
The video is of a speech given by Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher hosted at the Bethel University by the Minnesota Free Market Institute that is professionally presented complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts and figures of pretty much what many have warned America and other nations about the ulterior motive of the concept of global warming and the climate change diatribe – whether the descriptive words have been changed from global warming (because of the credibility of the claims being shown) or the concept of climate change caused by human activity.

YouTube video of the speech and transcript [excerpts] you can read, but watch the video for the full speech:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I have read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it. [I]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it. 
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not. [II] 
But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to help it.
So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:
Sail on, O Ship of State!

Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,

Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

Fellow Americans, you need to call your representatives and senators in Congress and follow up with a written letter, either mailed or faxed – and tell them there is now way you want to give up America’s sovereignty and your freedom and liberties for a treaty based upon a consensus, not a scientific fact, concerning any perceived climate change and cap-and-trade schemes.
Sodahead published comments that ended with this paragraph:

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

The Second American Revolution has begun this 2006. It is time to wrestle our government out of the hands of sociocrats and bureaucrats whose agenda is not conducive with the US Constitution or its Bill of Rights. It is also time to dissolve the United Nations or at least give notice to that dysfunctional and corrupt world body and let them know that if they do not change their membership qualifications exclusively those nations who promote democracy and a free people – then they can find another place to hold their meetings besides the United States. In the meantime, the United States needs to hold any funds due or promised to that world body called the United Nations and let the world know that we are no longer paying for any schemes initiated here or anywhere.
Some would say that such an action by our president constitutes a violation so great that it would require an impeachment hearing. Good luck. The American voters (majority) in 2006 and 2008 has guaranteed that sociocrats have the majority strength in the US Congress, which means there isn’t any way that congressional members would agree to an impeachment hearing.
When Mark Alexander at Patriot Post stated that America is not only in an economic crisis but a constitutional crisis as well – he was not talking out of his hat.
I love America, not just because I was born here, but what it stands for (in history) and I also respect the people in the United Kingdom having the privilege to serve with British soldiers in NATO multi-force training exercises and having, on occasion the opportunity to raise a mug of ale/beer with them when off duty. Like the Australians and Canadians, we have much in common despite our cultural differences and different structure of government in the endeavors to promote and maintain democracy (Parliament vs. Congress as an example) – but united in a common language, despite the difference in grammar.
Remarkable leaders have come from the United Kingdom, formerly called Great Britain – Queen VictoriaWinston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher being the most famous. Above all we have held a special relationship despite America’s rebellion as a colony of the King of England and our governmental split from Mother England. Truly, that in itself is astounding.
I remember the day of September 11th, 2001, when horror and tragedy struck America and how people in the streets of London were shocked and tears of sadness for the Americans who suffered in the hands of the tyranny and evil of Islamic Fascism. The United Kingdom has been a good friend, and now he comes to America with a warning that Americans must heed to and act upon. The steamroller effect of our presidents push for socialism and entry into an agreement of a world government, a New World Order is about to become a reality – and the door that opens this calamity will be the Copenhagen Treaty, just as the socialist programs of those who would sacrifice all that Americans have lived and died for vanishing over the approaching horizon.
Today I was going to report a matter that occurred in what has been deemed the number one freest state of the Union, New Hampshire, where a student was not allowed to wear his military uniform for his senior picture, but a Muslim was allowed to wear her traditional headdress. Of all the implications here, my first thought was: What did this principal of this United States school of education have against the uniformed men and women of the United States Armed Forces?
Then the email arrived from Joan Bartelson – and this serious matter needed my attention. Both stories have a tale to tell as to what America has become and that too many Americans have allowed things to get this far into troubling issues concerning the rights and liberties that we have apparently not appreciated enough to retain them or have chosen to give up freedom and liberties in exchange for promises made by charlatans who we have elected to operate the government of the United States of America.
This treaty is right up the alley of the political left because it will transfer wealth from one group to another – without consent, without representation and whether you like it or no.

This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, was it intended to be an expression of the American mind and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.
Thomas Jefferson [letter to Henry Lee, May 8th 1825]

We all share the love of peace, but our sons and daughters must learn two lessons men everywhere and in every time have had to learn; that the price of freedom is dear but not nearly so costly as the loss of freedom—and that the advance and continuation of civilization depend on those values for which men have always been willing to die. Ronald Reagan

If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. … There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slavesWinston Churchill

… If we care about our remaining liberties we must at some point draw a line in the sand and let politicians and bureaucrats know we will not tolerate further encroachment on our God-given rights to libertyWalter E. Williams

Are we still raising young people who will be emboldened by the truth of human equality to fight for their liberty? Will they resist the temptation to give in to the cowardly behavior that allows tyrants to reign? Will they have the courage to resist tyranny —- particularly when it offers the kind of comfortable servitude that our era of material abundance makes possible? Alan Keyes

Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of the government. The history of government is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is the history of the limitation of government, not the increase of itWoodrow Wilson

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of libertyJohn F. Kennedy

Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God.  I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” Patrick Henry [Speech to the Virginia Convention, March 23rd 1775]

[I] I have not been able to totally verify this, but here is what appears to be the reason why Barack Hussein Obama received a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing: Our President of the United States is going to sell out America’s sovereignty as surely as GW Bush tried to do with the North American Union initiative by signing this treaty. It appears that Mr. Obama’s narcissism and vanity has been used to gain America’s entry into this global endeavor created by those who would make the most of it – when even President Bill Clinton refused to join their effort in signing the Kyoto Treaty. And we thought Slick Willy was a terrible president!

[II] Democrats have demonstrated this attitude toward the American people by insisting upon passing legislative policies that the people do not want – like their heath care initiative.