State of Our Union: Fantasy World Of Barack Hussein Obama



President Obama’s State of the Union address reminded me of a Brothers Grimm fairy tale or a person looking at the world through rose-colored glasses instead of tackling reality.
Let’s be frank – it was full of lies and misinformation.
It was also a demonstration how this narcissist’s ego has increased after elected by a narrow 51.3% margin. I still believe after investigating voting fraud alarms in 2012 that he won by his fans, useful idiots, and political machine’s illegal efforts. I would like to believe that less than half of our nation’s citizens do not fall for the propaganda and promise of a great America through enormous debt and a bloated unconstitutional government.

Boldly, this president has circumvented the constitutional law and Congress – and not enough are complaining or preparing an impeachment hearing. Even in his State of the Union address, he confidently told the US Congress that if they did not play ball with him and agree to his policies and agenda he would find a way to use his executive powers – the problem is that he is not following what the Constitution states concerning those powers. For example, his duty is to enforce laws passed by Congress and signed by him – he and previous presidents have not done so when it comes to illegal aliens.

Back in the limelight is the already proven farce of a “global warming” now called “global climate change” based on a proven false hypothesis which blames human activities when it is more clearly the sun increased solar flares and storms. Thanks to the media and unscrupulous junk scientists who are riding this spoof for its fame and recognition, and more funding.
President Obama falsely bragged how much the debt was cut, but failed to see that it rose drastically and more than any other president has in four years – more than GW Bush did in eight years.
Besides increasing national debt, despite his so-called fix by overtaxing 1% of the population, which is not accurate – citizens that are not wealthy are seeing a serious case of inflation and when ObamaCare kicks in full circle they are going to be burdened at every level. If it is not a tax, why would the IRS be in charge of this collection? Fining someone because they either choose not to participate or cannot afford to participate is total tyranny.
Obama stated:
Senators—senators of both parties are working together on tough new laws to prevent anyone from buying guns for resale to criminals. Police chiefs are asking our help to get weapons of war and massive ammunition magazines off our streets, because these police chiefs, they’re tired of seeing their guys and gals being outgunned. If you want to vote no, that’s your choice. But these proposals deserve a vote, because in the two months since Newtown, more than a thousand birthdays, graduations, anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun. More than a thousand.
The media and sociocrats have continually mislabeled semiautomatic rifles as “weapons of war” and “assault” rifles. Weapons of war are automatic weapons, which was limited in 1934 by the National Firearms Act that required a stamp tax and registration of all military firearms purchased by civilians. In 1986 the Firearm Owners Protection Act limited civilians from purchasing military assault rifles – weapons of war.
Obama’s comment of “more than a thousand” was confusing, but of course that is what Obama and cohorts do. Anti-Second Amendment morons like the Violence Policy Center claim –
…more than 30,000 Americans die in gun suicides, homicides, and unintentional shootings.
All it takes is for anyone to look at the FBI yearly report (2011) and see that that is a lie. A monthly average of 715 murders occurred in 2011. Firearm related fatalities has dropped 52% between 1991 and 2001, yet more civilians (66%) own firearms, which means when citizens are armed violent crimes drop.
The handgun murder rate decline 56% and the handgun national inventory grew 99%, mostly caused by politicians talking about bans and firearm confiscation which forced people to rush out and purchase before they are no longer on the market.
It all equates to more lawful firearms, less violent crimes.
The 1968 Gun Control Act was supposed to reduce crime by — among other things — limiting interstate firearms and ammunition commerce to federally licensed dealers, limiting handgun sales to adults age 21 or older, and restricting long gun sales to ages 18 and older. However, the graph below shows that murder rates continued rising after 1968, and peaking in 1980. After enactment of FOPA, murder rates again increased to a second peak in 1991. When the first Brady Bill took effect in 1994 — background check and 5-day waiting period on handgun sales — murder was already declining. The Clinton gun ban also took effect in 1994, making it “unlawful to manufacture, transfer and possess semiautomatic assault weapons [or] large capacity ammunition feeding devices [holding over 10 ammunition cartridges].” In 1998, the Brady law replaced waiting periods with the National Instant Check System for all firearms purchase through licensed dealers. Murder rates leveled off between 1999 and 2007, dipping 3% in 2004, the year the Clinton ban sunset, before rising 3% again in 2005. Then between 2007 and 2011, murder rates declined another 16%. … Violent crime rates are lower than they’ve beensince 1970; the murder rate is the lowest since 1963. Yet gun ownership is at an all-time high.
How much misinformation and information left out, or just plain lies will it take before We the People stand against these tyrants against the Second Amendment?
Once the Second Amendment is gone, the First Amendment will soon follow.
Many experts agree that the Brady Bill and Clinton gun ban had no impact on crime. For example, Philip J. Cook, “regarded as the nation’s foremost authority on gun control” by the University of Virginia School of Law, concluded that the Brady Bill “had no statistically discernible  effect on reducing gun deaths.” Both the Centers for Disease Control and National Academy of Science concluded that results were too inconsistent to clearly endorse the Brady Bill as a crime-fighting tool. The National Academy of Science also found the Clinton gun ban to be ineffective in reducing crime. The National Gang Crime Research Center found: “Gang members were significantly more likely to report it has been easier since the Brady Bill went into effect to acquire illegal guns.” The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated that by the end of 2011, there were “at least 8 million active permits to carry concealed handguns in the United States.” The graph below shows that since 2001, RTC states’ violent crime rates were 30% lower, on average, than states which restrict citizens’ right to carry. When a madman murders people, gun banners want to restrict law-abiding citizens’ right of self-defense, claiming one life saved justifies infringing everybody’s freedom. But when lives are saved using a firearm, we hear nothing.
Obama’s recent sworn oath means nothing to him and congressional members …
 I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Article II, Section 1, Constitution of the United States
Advertisements