I wonder what historians are going to write about the Barack Hussein Obama [alias Barry Sotero] phenomenon? It will certainly reflect the character of not just the man, but American society as well. The people elected him in 2008 despite clear facts pointing towards his associations with anti-American, anti-Constitution Marxism as well serious flaws in his character and that of whom he associated.
An inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, will they wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job? … He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
During the same period, Norman Podhoretz was asking the same questions in the Wall Street Journal …
To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.
Despite this information, the voters elected him in 2008 and despite breaking every promise of “Hope and Change” – they reelected him again in 2012. It did not seem to matter that he –
- had been caught lying, covering for inept and corrupt administration staff,
- violating the Constitution more than could believe,
- doubled the national debt of what it was when GW Bush left office [who was blamed during the first administration],
- lying about the Mitt Romney Bain Corporation [with no apology like he provided to foreign nations for America],
- Instituting a national healthcare system entitled ObamaCare that would NOT help Americans to afford healthcare, but instead make it more expensive for both the individual and their employer. This boondoggle is about to be presented in its full force, and Americans are going to find out too late that Marxism does not work as its record clearly shows for the past 100 years.
- Two major scandals: Fast and Furious and BenghaziGate, as well as other smaller scandals sprinkled in along the way.
Even the Bush administration record never looked this bad, so why did the American voter fall for this charlatan, his whole life a prop, who cannot think/speak without a teleprompter, and who promised to unite a nation through his charm and ethnicity, but instead divided it even further with the race card being used more than ever before.
Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools [and jobs] for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and it that isn’t racism, then nothing is.
Lowering standards in public, government-controlled schools in order to achieve a higher graduation rate is not doing the students any good and the scenario described above becomes reality.
Having a “black” [African-American] president made white progressives feel good about themselves. As I have written before, if that issue was so important why not chose someone who would not embarrass that ethnic group of Americans?
In 2008, I asked those who were hailing BH Obama as their savior, why specifically were they voting for him. The answer was unanimous – “It is about time we had a Black president”.
Intellectual answers do not come from the sheeple of progressive socialism. Indeed, if they are presented with facts to counter their parroting of their indoctrinating mentors, they turn to name calling with the word racist thrown in for intimidation.
If the candidate was Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, or Allen West I could see voting for the first “Black” President of the United States. However, centrally, I would vote for any of those three not because of their skin pigmentation, but because of their character, intellect, and love for constitutional law. These men hold Truth as a sacred honor.
BH Obama’s life is full of lies and secrets suppressed from public view, molded by corrupt and Marxist political machines, tutored and tailored to sway the sheeples who believe it is okay for government to steal from one group to provide for another. His inflated ego and narcissism developed along the way. If the facts of who and what Obama is revealed, the corporate national media quickly suppress it as they perform their duty as the democratic-socialist mouthpiece instead of the eyes and ears of the People. The only way to force that element of media is to ignore them and swamp their offices with letters, email, and telephone calls demanding objectivity and truth in journalism. It goes the same way for a tyrannical and oppressive government. But those changes can never occur without our society reforming itself at the same time, becoming self-taught in Constitution 101 or attend a course at Hillsdale College [free or $50 donation] and reshape their views with facts instead of the steady indoctrination they received in government-controlled educational institutions.
Voters need to realize that whomever they choose to represent them in government has the power to legislate their life away. Those elected should be closely monitored to ensure they adhere to their oath of office and the articles of the US Constitution. The Founders were clear on this point for a very good reason. Indeed, the United States prospered and their constitutional republic lasted longer than they imagined for most of them. Benjamin Franklin was the most pessimistic founder announcing that the United States was a republic, if you can keep it.
We did not keep it and we are soon to lose it.
Obama/Sotero is a product of affirmative action and reverse racism, and seems to have never been bothered about his under achievement. He was admitted at Columbia despite unremarkable grades at Occidental. He became a US Senator despite his mediocre and laughable record as a “community organizer” in Illinois. In the Senate, he produced no record at all. All his life he was told he was good enough, but when it came to reality his record always proved them wrong.
In 2008, his qualifications of being President of the United States was his oratory skills (despite the need for teleprompters), intellect, and cool personality. The truth about Obama did not deter the American voter from reelecting him because they were more afraid of the painted image of Mitt Romney being president. Not that he would have fared as well as the GOP establishment would have us believe. While Mr. Romney’s character is that of an angel compared to Obama, as the governor of Massachusetts his record showed, he tried to please everyone instead of performing his job as a political leader under constitutional law. He adopted the idea of ObamaCare, and installed it in his state and changed his stance upon several issues; to include same-sex marriage and government controlled abortion.
What does mark the legacy of BH Obama is the fact that he has been instrumental in pushing forward the Marxist progressive movement in America that is intended to replace our constitutional republic.
The problems we face are primarily of the Democratic Party origin; however, the Republicans have failed as well, kowtowing instead of standing for principle and the articles of the Constitution. They have forgotten that the Constitution must never be compromised and put their political party ahead of what is good for our nation. The GOP had a constitutional candidate, Ron Paul, but shunned him and joined the corporate media and the Sociocrats in painting him as a radical and fool. If they backed him in the primaries like they did Mitt Romney and he was elected as the representative of the GOP and Tea Party movement – this article would be writing about the failed presidency of Obama in past tense. The GOP used the Tea Party organization to gain votes, and then turned their backs upon them even blaming the loss of Romney’s election to them. No, they lost because they did not stand up to the Sociocrat propaganda machine exposing their lies for what they were. Problem is, the nation is suffering for it, as well as the danger of losing constitutional law and our Bill of Rights.
A government that stockpiles firearms and ammunition that it says citizens are forbidden to have and ordering armed explosive proof vehicles for the DHS tells us that this government cannot be trusted and has something up its sleeve.
Matt Patterson concludes:
In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.
We the People put him in their (51.2%) – We the People need to insist he be removed.