Nancy Pelosi: Spokesperson For Obamacare

The faithful Obama stooge is at it again, the wealthy socialist once again demonstrates there is no bounds to her hypocrisy and moronic ideology …

Frankly, the woman needs professional help. How can this woman look at herself in the mirror or sleep at night?

Continue reading

Price to Be Paid for Incompetence

John Kerry was a big mistake on the part of BH Obama [among many mistakes] when he chose him to be Secretary of State, as with most of those he has chosen for his cabinet and department/agency heads. Indeed, Eric Holder is still the US Attorney General despite committing perjury before a congressional hearing in the investigation of the ‘Fast-N-Furious‘ operation/scandal and has yet to divulge full information concerning the actions, or rather non-actions of the President and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who bailed out when the scandal of Benghazi broke out. John Kerry stated when taking office he would ‘get to the bottom of Benghazi’ – we are still waiting; too busy seeking to bomb Syria.

Continue reading

Hillary Rodham Clinton: Instead of a Trial, Former Secretary of State Receiving an Award

Hillary Rodham Clinton, former Secretary of State who resigned in the midst of a serious scandal in Benghazi that caused, along with the President, the death and injury of Americans serving there is now the recipient of National Constitution Center 2013 Liberty Medal. A slap in the face for those who have suffered from her corrupt career life in politics and the law office she was part of early in her husband’s career, but people like Nancy Pelosi are thrilled. It makes about as much sense as Al Gore and Barack Obama receiving a Nobel Prize.

Continue reading

Snowden: Whistle-Blowing Hero or Traitor?

Edward Joseph Snowden [June 21st 1983], a former technical contractor and CIA employee working for government contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton is big news in the mainstream media. The mainstream coverage is mostly concerned with charges of espionage and theft of US government

property for his actions in leaking to the public classified information that led to the discovery that NSA (National Security Agency) is intercepting US telephone communications, including email under a program entitled PRISM without proper legal warrant. The original exposé was published by The Guardian and Washington Post. An intelligence historian, Matthew M. Aid, stated that disclosures linked to Snowden have confirmed longstanding suspicion that NSA’s surveillance in this country is far more intrusive than we knew.

Continue reading

Reasons For Serious Reformation of the Federal Government

How much scandal, anti-constitutional and anti-United States acts, policies, and agendas does it take for the US Congress and the American citizens to realize that Obama and associates are detrimental to the future of the United States of America? Indeed, considering the past two administrations, how much does it take for the American people to demand that We the People return to control our government as prescribed by the US Constitution and elect individuals who actually believe in the Constitution and respect its limitations of power of the federal government and adherence of state governments to the unionified laws of the Constitution?

Beginning with the most recent:

Continue reading

Pelosi Demonstrates She Does Not Understand Constitution She Supposedly Protects

More evidence of Nancy Pelosi’s stupidity revealed in a recent statement. Endorsing the Obama and Feinstein anti-Second Amendment rhetoric, she stated that members of Congress took an oath to “protect and defend”. (“…protect and defend the Constitution and the American people”). This is also another example of how these sociocrats and its media mouthpiece adds and alters what has been said or written. The actual oath, and apparently Pelosi did not take it serious enough to remember it, is to:

…support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

In effect, she just pleaded guilty to the fact she has broken her oath of office, not only not understanding what the Constitution’s article means, but also has no clue what her sworn oath of office is. Pelosi is an embarrassment to the nation and shame on Californians for keeping her in office for such a long time.
If she agrees with Obama, Feinstein, and company, then she is not defending the Constitution. If she defends gun control actions that has already been in place and apparently has not worked, than she is not “defending the American people”. In either aspect, Pelosi and others like her in Congress are not worth the salary they are paid.

Election 2012: Usual Mud Slinging

Harry Reid: Obnoxious Hypocrite
Reid and now Pelosi is making a big issue over what Reid stated: that Romney hasn’t paid his taxes in ten years, yet during the primary election he released his tax returns for 2010, which clearly showed he paid taxes. It is hypocritical since a member of Obama’s cabinet and the Secretary of Treasury was found to have cheated (made a “mistake”) on tax return. Like Boehner stated: “It’s a side show” – president does not reveal those records, so why should someone else. Members of Congress are not required to make public their tax records, and the GOP leadership is correct – it is a private matter. Romney made public his 2010 tax returns and that is good enough for me. More important matters concern me – like this would be a moot issue if there was a flat income tax with NO deductions. No cheaters and everyone pays the same rate, while those that make more money still pay more than those with less – because it is a PERCENTAGE system – flat percentage rate with no progressive rates. Democrats are always whining about fairness – what could be fairer than that? If there is a flat tax rate, then maybe, just maybe, those clowns in Congress will have a limitation as to what they will receive to spend – and do a budget, as the rest of us must.

Harry Reid has been involved in scandals during his career and has no business pointing fingers, especially when it is based upon not proof. Just because someone “told him”? 

Pelosi is a known socialist and her rhetoric about Republicans only caring about the wealthy is old tactics that surprisingly still work. Yet, companies that have donated large sums of money to Democrats have gotten better tax breaks than other companies – of course, they won’t tell you that. It is not equal across the board. It is not within the power of Congress to do so, and shouldn’t be.
Politicians use tax paying made public a requirement for running for office, when it is not. What should be made mandatory is that candidates must pass a background check (and maybe a drug test) before they are allowed to run for office.  
Democrats are people that live in glass houses and throw rocks at others. Their poster boy sitting in the Oval Office has a shady past, an imagined and made up biography, and if he were anyone else would be advised to seek psychiatric counseling. The matter of whether or not Obama was born in Kenya and registered in Hawaii is still legitimate – but the Left looks at it and describes it as lunacy.
When Obama was running for Illinois Senate, his campaign rival was Jack Ryan, who had to drop out of the race because the Obama team managed to get his divorce records unsealed and leaked it to the media, who was eager to spread mud on anyone except a Democrat. Proof was when all the allegations that pointed to Obama’s shady and mysterious past, was not looked into at all or aggressively as Jack Ryan’s divorce records.
Most of the time politicians use imagined mud to sling against opponents, all the while not addressing to the voters just what they will do if they are elected – and how they will address issues at hand. If Romney or any other political candidate that was not a Democrat would have made up an imaginary biography, he would have been toast. But Obama not only continues to be the president, but has the audacity to run for a second term after performing actions that are impeachable offenses. But that word will never be heard, like we constantly heard when GW Bush was office – everyone is intimidated in being painted a racist, just for telling and presenting the truth.
Reid and Pelosi are making accusations based on one factor: “someone told them”. The media is making, as it is such a big deal. Reid’s statement is automatically denounced when he accused Romney of not paying taxes in the past ten years when this year he made public his 2010 tax returns. To some, his making such records public gave those more to whine about when they stated that Romney did not pay enough taxes. Well if they did not, it is not because he and others cheated, it is because he went with the system. Therefore, the system needs to change to ensure that everyone pays the same percentage rate and there will be no need to argue over such things. With no deductions, there is no chance of cheating – unless there is income that is not declared.
Romney is releasing his 2011 tax returns, as he did on his 2010 tax returns, but that is not going to be enough for the democratic-socialists – they are saying he has not paid taxes in ten years. This is truly a lie, like the GOP leadership stated, because his 2010 returns showed he spent millions on taxes and annually give a lot to charity. Much more than Obama or any of the whiners have paid in taxes or donated to charity.
Obama is fishing. He knows his record is horrible in terms of accomplishments and filled with corruption and scandals. He has to convince the voters that Romney is worse or will be worse if president, then he has been. That is all of it in a nutshell.
While Romney does not have a good record in sticking to principles, he is going to have to change that if he is elected as the next president. The reformation required to get the United States back on its feet and on track is going to take perseverance, as well as stick to principles of constitutional law.  He is also going to require a Congress that will work with him and a Supreme Court with non-politically motivated justices that uphold the Constitution and not “interpret” it according to foreign laws and special interests.

Obama File: President Prevaricator

From the beginning of his term as President of the United States it was a series of deceptions aimed at naïve Americans who elected him – hoping for change.
ObamaCare was pushed through quickly, and as Nancy Pelosi stated :
…pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.
Pass the bill BEFORE you find what is in it, not that enough Americans could understand it that have been educated in government-run/trade union schools.
Obama in September 2009 stated to a joint session in Congress:
Now, add it all up, and the plan I’m proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years.

Reminiscent of GW Bush’s “fuzzy math”.

This week the Congressional Budget Office updated their earlier report covering a ten year period of ObamaCare being fully in place with an estimated cost of $1.76 trillion – twice as what Obama told Congress and nation. The true figures won’t be out until next year without the Supreme Court throwing it out or being repealed by Congress that will surpass the $2 trillion mark. Hopefully the Supreme Court justices will make that decision, hard to say with one of them criticizing our Constitution on foreign public TV interview.
Obama said:
If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan– again in 2009.
Obama and his cohorts insisted that this program was not a takeover of personal health care, but for the uninsured. The Hill reports differently:
Four million Americans can expect to lose their employer-provided healthcare by 2016, according to revised figures, far more than the 1 million people estimated last year.
That number will probably increase as employers find it necessary or more favorable to drop coverage and pay penalty because it will be cheaper. That means higher taxes.
Obama promised:
Under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortion, and federal conscience laws will remain in place. – State of Union address in 2009.
The Department of Health and Human Services has completed a rule this week that establishes state health care exchanges, and those plans will collect from each premium payer a $1 surcharge to fund abortions. Of course, if abortion is being funded now, what makes people think that taxpayers won’t continue to pay for it? Of course, there will be accounting tricks to go around the Hyde Amendment that prohibits direct taxpayer funding of abortion. But government is good at finding loopholes because we keep electing lawyers in political office.
It is extremely important, folks, that we continue to hound our senators and representatives about the ObamaCare program and its unconstitutionality. It must be either removed by the order of the Supreme Court or repealed in accordance to constitutional law. President Obama has been busy devising strategies to get public support – but too many Americans have awaken from their apathetic slumber or learned about his political lawyer tricks. On March 26ththere will be a Supreme Court hearing. Those that support this atrocity of legislation will be holding a prayer vigil – probably to their government god.
The Washington Postand The New York Timeshas frequently reported (and formed opinion, of which neither media knows the difference) – that the Republican Party is losing women because of its policy against free contraception. Meanwhile, Obama’s approval rating drops according to the Washington Post and ABC Newspolls by four points – especially after he stuck his nose into the Sandra Fluke affair. And, after stating that women are leaving the GOP in droves, The New York Timeshas noted that there has been a drop in female support for Obama.
A “profound” statement from Obama:
When we start using religion as a bludgeon in politics, we start questioning other people’s faith, we start using religion to divide, instead of bringing the country together, then I think we’ve got a problem.
Yes, Mr. Obama, the problem is you, Nancy Pelosi, your Attorney General, your Czars, your progressive democratic-socialism, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
In other news
Two Democrats introduced a freedom of the Second Amendment bill – and I am NOT joking.
Senator Mark Begich(D-AK) and Senator Joe Manchin(D-WV) introduced S. 2188 – the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2012that is a companion bill to H.R. 822, which passed the House of Representatives last November by a vote of 272-154. This legislation, if passed, will permit any concealed-carry permit holder to carry a concealed handgun in any other state of the Union that also issues permits. Which means, any other state except Illinois, and in lesser degrees in others.
And …
Voter identification has been used in part of the voter identification process in many state elections, but the Department of Justice has blocked a voter identification law in Texas because it claims that it unjustly restricts minority voting rights as outlined in Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The same thing happened to the South Carolina voter ID law, which the state is currently fighting in federal court as I write this.
Their reasoning:

The DOJ used statistical gymnastics to claim that the Lone Star State’s law discriminates against Hispanics, claiming that Hispanics were 46.5 percent more likely than non-Hispanics to lack proper voter ID.

Maybe it is because “Hispanics” without driver’s licenses are statistically illegal aliens. Duh!
Folks, it is all about getting votes – whether they are legally able to do so or not. The political club that sticks up for illegal aliens is the party that will get their vote – and any sympathizers along the way. Plain and simple. It is why RINOs in the GOP, who call themselves “moderates” – you know, like “progressives” used to be “liberals” thing.
Not hard to believe, Patriot Postreports:
…the United Nations Human Rights Council is also looking into U.S. Voter ID laws, so the whole matter will no doubt be resolved satisfactorily once the likes of China, Cuba, Libya, and Saudi Arabia weigh in.
As the American Thinker(Rick Moran) wrote – and I agree and wrote about it in past:
The United Nations Human Rights Council is investigating the issue of American election laws at its gathering on minority rights in Geneva, Switzerland.. This, despite the fact that some members of the council have only in the past several years allowed women to vote, and one member, Saudi Arabia, still bars women from the voting booth completely.Eight states have passed voter ID laws in the past year, voter ID proposals are pending in 32 states and the Obamaadministration has recently moved to block South Carolina and Texas from enacting their voter ID measures.
Enuff said, for now.

Obama: The Devil is in the Details

Let’s get one fact out right off the top – oil is a commodity and its price is based upon supply and demand. One of the good things that a President of the United States and member of Congress should have is at least Economics 101 – and, most importantly a major in political science, if not a degree. But instead, we choose lawyers who are trained to constantly look for loopholes – and flat out lie for their cause. Their cause? Money-Power or all the above.
Obama’s “Hope and Change” has taken a spill into the lake and drowned for three years and now he is scrambling (on the surface) to make voters think he is or has been doing his job. Apart from taking lavish vacations that cost the taxpayers, who are struggling with income that nowhere matches or comes close to the cost of living, he is trying to make himself look good for election year.

Back in 2005, Bush was blamed, because of his family’s background in oil, for the energy issue. Yet, when he attempted to make America self sufficient, Congress fought him all the way. Not saying that he was so good at the tasks before him, especially in domestic issues. The main mouthpiece against Bush was Nancy Pelosi, socialist- extraordinaire – who blamed the President (Bush) for what actions Congress was not taking. And, of course, those dirty guys at Wall Street – those mean-spirited profiteers who actually do what they do for money – the horror. This is coming from a woman who is in the upper 5% wealth bracket of America … and who spends countless dollars on facial treatments with little or no effect, in fact it makes her look worse. Maybe its the meanness coming out of her, like my grandma used to say. You better believe that her special interest “green” corporations will get a break.

Fast forward to Obama administration – price of fuel did not go down, when it did very little and had nothing to do with what Obama wasn’t doing. Now it is skyrocketing again because instead of ensuring that we are self sufficient, he has alienated places where we get crude oil. But then again, how can we be “short” of our own oil and still exporting some of it? I guess they didn’t teach that part in Economics 101 – I just remember the “supply and demand” part.
Meanwhile, Europe is doing badly in the economics scene as well, maybe worse than ours. Health care, that Obama emulated from Europe, in the UK is 18% of national budget (9.4% of GDP) – and that is only one government program.
Obama is bragging about cutting corporate tax from 35% to 28%, which is still 3% of the international average concerning other nations. He, and others like him, just don’t get it – we have to compete in the world trade arena, not scare away business overseas. Once again, Obama does not reveal the details: He wants to require that the US companies pay a minimum tax rate on any foreign earnings – above the aforementioned 28%. Oh, what a deal! This favors certain industries over others – probably (didn’t research) the ones that provide heavy election funding. Another thing people are forgetting: some corporations don’t pay ANY corporate taxes, but we, the consumer, pay through the nose with lower wages and higher prices.
Have you ever wondered why wages don’t increase when a corporation raises its prices? Hmm.
Wall Street Journal:
All the Republican candidates have called for lower corporate tax rates. Mitty Romney proposes reducing the top rate to 25%. Rick Santorum proposed a 17.5% general corporate tax rate and zero rate for manufacturers. Ron Paul proposes 15% and Newt Gingrich 12.5%.
So, why isn’t Newt Gingrichgetting more votes and percentages in polls?
While Obama lowers one area, he raises another and proposes to raise the tax on dividends from 15% to a whopping 44.8%! Someone forgot to tell him that there are middle-class Americans who get dividends that goes towards their retirement, college expense for kids, et cetera. Speculation and investing is no longer just the “rich” man’s game.
But wait, there’s more. As the government does in standard income tax, it is taxed more than once: first taxed as profit at corporate rate and then what is paid in dividends, which equates to 64%.
Just like when he campaigned for “Change” – too many forgot to get the details of just what those changes were.
They were more interested in electing an African-American president for the first time in history.
So why didn’t they choose someone wiser and more honest?
If that was such an important issue – why not Larry Elders, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, or even Alan Keyes?
Because they are not part of the progressive crowd – not part of the great Democratic Party. Which is why Ronald Reagan her as he put it – “they left me”.
Good grief. Sometimes I am almost embarrassed to be called an American.

Info Highway: Random Thinking and Snippets on February 4th 2010

Snippets & Random Thoughts on a wintry day ….

hand_point2       Barack H. Obama, as his predecessor, promised bipartisanship and unity, but that is not evident. Racism and Marxist/political ideology dominates over statesmanship. When the campaign is over, the elected official, whether president or congressman/woman require by the Constitution and congressional ethics that they perform their jobs in a stately manner. His speech at State of the Union was an hypocritical abomination.