Jihadism: Coming to America

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have been banned from the United Kingdom. Shocking news coming from a great ally that was formerly our enemy in the 18th century. A people who fought against Nazi tyranny and invasion with admirable fortitude and strength, is succumbing to forces of Islam whose agenda is world domination and a world theocratic government whose power is sustained by a religious doctrine and keeping the people ignorant and fearful.

The crusade against the powers of the UK doing this is HERE in the form of a petition.

Jihad Watch also has an article about this affair.

Advertisements

State of Our Union: June 9th 2013

  • The US spends at least $80 billion a year on intelligence operations and yet federal leadership insists that we do not secure our southern borders and continue to allow illegal aliens to enter and remain in the United States with no background check. American citizens are spied upon by leadership who is not required any background check in order to campaign for public office in federal government, mistakenly relying upon the media to objectively investigate the background of candidates. BH Obama is a prime example that limitations provided by the Constitution must be adhered to, as well as a complete background check of ALL candidates for public office be conducted as part of the candidates application.

Continue reading

Info Highway: IRS and DOJ, the Arm of Tyrannical Government

lighthouse9_animatedhand_point2Washington [Reuters/AP] …. President Obama fired IRS top official yesterday over improper targeting of conservative groups for special scrutiny during three congressional probes of the IRS in progress. Obama ordered Jack Lew, Treasury Secretary to demand the resignation of Stephen Miller, IRS commissioner. Obama was quoted saying:

I’ll do everything in my power to make sure nothing like this happens again by holding the responsible parties accountable, (and) by putting in place new checks and new safeguards. … Americans are right to be angry about it, and I am angry about it. I will not tolerate this kind of behavior in any agency, but especially in the IRS, given the power that it has and the reach that it has into all of our lives.

Continue reading

Insanity Continues: Government-Controlled Schools and Vet Not Allowed to Possess Firearms

A testament to government controlled educational institutions … a high school teacher in Denton, Texas has violated the First Amendment by mentioning the Second Amendment. The assignment was simple, the Blaze article reports …

High School seniors at Denton High School were given a simple assignment in their English class: Write a paragraph about something you did over the weekend. There was no additional direction on topics for the essay. However, a few students who wrote about guns, including attending a gun show or going to shop for a gun, were told that they would be given a zero on the assignment if they did not change what they were writing about. The teacher, Mr. Dewey Christian, reportedly told the students that the topic was unacceptable. Marshall Williams, another student in the class who was given the option of a zero on the assignment or a rewrite, told about going to the Fort Worth Gun Show – something he has posted on his Facebook page: In the comments section of Williams’ Facebook of this photo he posted the following; …

Continue reading

Giglio Imbrogilo: McCarthyism Resurrected in New Form

BH Obama did not initiate the present anti-Christian persecution, but he certainly has extended its scope in several ways. He has forced religious institutions to provide birth-control coverage for their employees, against certain religious doctrines. Now he and his liberal watchdogs have created such a furor that a pastor has cancelled an invitation of benediction at his second inaugural ceremony. The fury is over the pastor preaching a sermon that homosexuality is a sin – 20 years ago.
The Atlanta pastor is Louie Giglio who stated two decades ago in a sermon:

…only way out of a homosexual lifestyle … is through the healing power of Jesus.

Muslims in Britain: Milking the Welfare System Dry

Sometimes it just seems that this world is too mad – in terms of insane.
Soren Kern reported:
Muslim immigrants with more than one wife will see an increase in their social welfare benefits beginning in 2013, when reforms to the British welfare system come into effect. Although polygamy is illegal in Britain, the state effectively recognizes the practice for Muslim men, who often have up to four wives (and in some instances five or more) in a harem.
If polygamy is illegal, why are British taxpayers paying for all those wives.

Something else to consider that is only understandable because Americans must pay for illegal immigrant welfare – why should British pay for people who come to United Kingdom not to assimilate, but to subjugate?

They are doing the same thing Mexicans are doing here in America. I am not talking about legal citizens or legal immigrants, but illegal immigrants, who initially break our immigration laws, then break another by obtaining false documentation; and then have the gall to protest about their rights, cry “racism” and all the while promoting a movement called Reconquista. In addition, saying that they have the right to acquire social welfare benefits at legal Americans’ expense. They weren’t invited and they came when they knew it was illegal to do so. Get their welfare benefits from their Mexican government, where their loyalties lie anyway.
One would think with the unemployment so high that the federal government would be actually enforcing laws they created – immigration laws. And in the process, make the employers who hire illegals pay for the cost of deporting them with a stern warning to never return unless they properly apply for visa status like everyone else.
Back to Britain …
Currently the state pays extra wives in polygamous households reduced amounts of individual income support, in addition to the normal amount received by the husband and his first spouse. Under the new rules, however, the extra wives will be eligible to claim a full single person’s allowance (despite being married), while the original married couple will still receive the standard married person’s allowance. The changes are part of wide-ranging reforms to the welfare system that are being implemented by Prime Minister David Cameron’s coalition government, which admits that it wants to treat extra wives as single so that the state will not officially be recognizing polygamy as it is under the current system.
Politicians that circumvent laws and promote Big Government spending should be fired, wherever they serve. Slowly the Islamic immigrants are taking over our valued ally. America’s turn is coming at the rate we are going.
Over the decades, we have gradually succumbed to the mistakes Europe has made, thinking that democratic-socialism is the key to all of our troubles – never realizing it is the root of a nation’s troubles. Our republican system was working fine, created by men who worked it out and thought it carefully – with a system that would last. But when a crisis occurred, like the Great Depression, it provided a window of opportunity to get the people to actually want a nanny state; instead of realizing that the cause was not because there were not enough social programs, but government corruption and over legislation.
This especially became evident when President L. Johnson passed his Great Society legislation – and from there things accelerated from bad to worse to devastating.
Back to Britain’s polygamy welfare problem …

Details of the changes were revealed in a 13-page legal briefdated July 19, and published by the library of the House of Commons. The document states: “Treating second and subsequent partners in polygamous relationships as separate claimants could mean that polygamous households receive more under Universal Credit than under the current rules for means-tested benefits and tax credits.” . . . In September 2011, a British newspaper exposé on the subject found that the phenomenon of bigamy and polygamy — permitted by Islamic Sharia law — is far more widespread in Britain than previously believed. The rapid growth in multiple marriages is being fuelled by multicultural policies that grant special rights to Muslim immigrants, who demand that Sharia law be reflected in British law and the social welfare benefits system. . . . The exposé shows how Muslim men can take a new spouse from anywhere in the world, father any number of children with her, and have British taxpayers assume responsibility for this family’s upkeep and care. . . . Muslim men also cheat the system by bringing brides from abroad as nannies for their children, or as nurses for a sick relative. After the bride’s one year visitors’ visa expires, she then disappears into a tight-knit local Muslim community and is then entitled to receive welfare handouts. . . . The United Kingdom also recognizes polygamous marriages in which both parties, before they moved to Britain, were resident in a country where the practice is legal. Since the 2008 change the former Labour government made to British law, a Muslim man with four wives is entitled to receive £10,000 ($15,000) a year in income support alone. He could also be entitled to more generous housing and council tax benefits to reflect the fact that his household needs a bigger property. . . . A separate investigative report describes how Muslim women suffer as a result of polygamy. It quotes a government social worker who is active in Muslim neighborhoods as saying: “The first wives get depressed because they are so ashamed of their husband taking a second or third wife. Many wives have been here for years, but have never been allowed to learn English or even go out of the house alone. They have no one to turn to for help.” …  Baroness Flather wrote: “Under Islamic Sharia law, polygamy is permissible. So a man can return to Pakistan, take another bride and then, in a repetition of the process, bring her to England where they also have children together — obtaining yet more money from the state. We cannot continue like this.” More recently she said: “Why are they allowed to have more than one wife? We should prosecute one or two people for bigamy…that would sort it out.”

I say: Deport them all. Polygamy is illegal, so why drag this scenario out when it is clear that Muslims in Britain are milking the system. It is like America – the government MUST enforce its laws.
Meanwhile in America: Criticizing religion, specifically Islam, may soon be illegal – another notch against the First Amendment and our government’s hypocrisy.
Islamic groups want laws passed against criticizing Islam – yet their doctrine dictates violence and other means against “non-believers” of Islamic faith. So, what they want is no one to contest their agenda to dominate the world, in which Islamic leadership has proclaimed publicly over and over again, and they can use hate speech and actions against any religion other than Islam. As a website clearly shows, the UN have attempted to make such international laws and at the same time, Islamic infiltration into judiciary and legislative branches of governments have pointed toward Sharia Law or some form of it, which would further advance the aforementioned agenda. Meanwhile, Christians and Jews are being persecuted and purged from even places like Iraq, where GW Bush told us was to be a model nation of his “nation building” program – that has obviously failed; along with other Middle East nations like Egypt and Syria clearly point out.
Media has blacked out documentaries that show the truth concerning doctrine and policies of Islamic fundamentalism, such as PBS – which should no longer receive taxpayer funding because of their bias nature in programming. 

State of Our Union: Chick-fil-A Controversy a Good Example

The Chick-fil-A controversy is, to say the least, idiocy. With so much more important things to focus upon that concerns our nation and what used to be OUR government – this controversy is ludicrous. The media, of course, eats idiocy up.
First, the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Second, Chick-fil-ACEO, Dan Cathy, exercised his rights in two ways:

(1) Freedom of Speech – he was asked to comment on his company’s support of the traditional family; which today is becoming extinct thanks to the democratic-socialist movement that has infiltrated our society and our government. His comment was:
Well, guilty as charged. We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and … we give God thanks for that. We want to do anything we possibly can to strengthen families. We intend to stay the course. We know that it might not be popular with everyone, but thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and operate on biblical principles.
2) Exercising his faith and family traditional values, and speaking out about something that he, as a Christian, knows is wrong. For reasons of the owner’s belief in their faith, Chick-fil-A stores are closed on Sundays – despite the fact of losing business by closing one day on a weekend.
Not only did the bias and nonobjective media hit upon this as though some serious crime was committed, but government got involved – where it doesn’t belong, as usual.
The Boston mayor, Thomas Menino declared that Chick-fil-A could not open franchises in the city – 
unless they open up their policies and do a complete 180. They’d have work with LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender] groups in terms of hiring, and there would have to be a public apology from Cathy
Rahmn Emanuel
Those outrageous, unethical, unconstitutional demands of a tyrant were met by another tyrant – mayor of Chicago (where else), Rahmn Emanuel, already infamous for his corruption and unconstitutional policies. He stated, as I noted in another article: Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values. Yes, we know about “Chicago values” – or rather its inability to promote good character and family values, religious or not.
Then, of course, there is the San Francisco mayor, Ed Lee, who stated he was:  
very disappointed Chick-fil-A doesn’t share our values and strong commitment to equality for everyone … The closest Chick-fil-A is 40 miles away, and I strongly recommend that they not try to come any closer.
Can you believe such a thing is happening in America? What was that about the Land of the Free? The only person or persons to be ashamed here is the outrageous attack upon an owner of a business for his religious beliefs and speaking his mind – especially when asked by the media. 
As Alexander Hamilton wrote at Patriot Post:
Now understand, Chick-fil-A does not discriminate against those with Gender Disorientation Pathology in their employment or service practices. That would be contrary to Christian doctrine, which instructs that we are to love the sinner and hate the sin. You can’t love someone if you shut him or her (or it) out, and despite ignorant protests from the Left, genuine Christians reach out to all people. These venomous assaults against the First Amendment and its protection clause ensuring the free exercise of faith not only earned the three mayors condemnation from even the ACLU, but also gave rise to a Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day on Wednesday of this week. If your local Chick-fil-A is not open today, that’s because the nationwide response in support of this company depleted their product inventory yesterday. The massive turnout in support of traditional family values created blocks-long lines around some Chick-fil-As, and my sense is that those same folks will be turning out in long lines at the polls in November.
Fat chance on the ACLU actually siding with someone who really has a problem with exercising their rights. ACLU is famous for siding with those who want to exercise rights at the expense of other citizens’ rights. Patriot Post:
Of course, Leftists are the consummate hypocrites. On the one hand, they boycott a certain restaurant because its CEO subscribes to the Judeo-Christian family model established through all of recorded history but is a model that doesn’t comport with Obama’s homosexual agenda. On the other hand, they fill the tanks of their cars with fuel purchased from Islamic cultures that condone the stoning of homosexuals.
Obama promised “change” – but those that voted for him failed to get the details. He has insisted at an international forum that our national motto be changed from “In God We Trust” to “E Pluribus Unum”. In October of 2010, when citing the Declaration of Independence, he deliberately omitted “endowed by our Creator”. But what can one expect being raised and mentored by Marxists and a minister of the family church, Jeremiah Wright, being a racist.
The keystone of our Republic, and any nation, is the family unit; and that unit remains solid and unified by parents instilling a code to follow in life – morality and/or values – regardless whether that family has a faith in any religion or none at all. A code of honor and values representing acceptable civilized ethics keeps a nation strong.
We should never fall to the whims and fancies of superstition and bias of human history, and indeed use our technology to improve ourselves. However, never think that just because we advance in technology and civilization that we must also throw away the basic values of integrity, good character, honor, dignity, and respect for other people as we ourselves which to be respected – become outdated. They, like the US Constitution and its amendments, should not and cannot be shelved for something else; for the options of choice, like democratic-socialism, history shows us it will fail.
Our nation has not failed or been downgraded because of Our Constitution and its amendments; but we are failing because we allowed those operating OUR government to circumvent and outright ignore constitutional law and involve itself upon our personal lives that has deteriorated those values that made us great from the beginning.
I do not agree that one must be religious, in terms of complete loyalty to a specific religious doctrine or member of a certain religious entity in order to exercise the basics of family values and codes of honor, integrity, honesty, and being responsible for choices we make. However, George Washington, who was a pious man, as well as a great general and statesman, stated in his farewell address in 1796:
Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. …reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
If religious principles or doctrine dictates persecution or outright torture and murder of “unbelievers” – the First Amendment cannot protect those who believe that fundamental doctrine nor should it. Yet, our present government, primarily the federal government, looks the other way when it comes to fundamental Islamists transgressing against other religions in such a manner – ignoring them and persecuting Christians, where Christianity under the laws, values and morality of Judeo-Christian principled law were the underlying natural laws that created constitutional law and the idea that all are equal.
BH Obama and associates in Congress and others who support them are chipping away at the First and Second amendments, which without those two amendments the others might as well have been written on toilet paper, used, and flushed. 
And, as far as Second Amendment rights, the governor of Louisiana and  President GW Bush are guilty as well for what they did or allowed to happen during and after the Katrina disaster. During a time when law-abiding citizens need firearms to protect themselves, family, and property – the government decided to confiscate their means of self defense. So, for those of you who think such a thing could not happen – it already has.
Men of our newly established government, especially Thomas Jefferson readily agreed that if those who operate the government For the People no longer abide by Constitutional law and the decisions of the people as a majority, then they have the right to rebel against that government. We the People must rebel by using the power at the voting booth; while not allowing special interests, nonobjective and bias media, and those that would destroy the Republic created. In addition, at the same time, we must encourage fellow Americans, whether they have faith in any religion or none at all, that the American society must reform itself, educate itself in constitutional law, and become more responsible as citizens and fellow Americans. That reform must begin within the family unit. Children must be raised in the concept that they are the future of our nation and must be taught self-discipline, respect for education, and respect for others and themselves; with honor, integrity, honesty as the principle of their code of life. Children must have ethical role models as parents – and husband and wife each have their own responsibilities in ensuring that it happens. Just like freedom of choice, parenting requires responsibility to ensure strong family units and thus a strong nation.
It is the People that make a nation, not just a government.